Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 12:16:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:56:19 -0600 (CST) From: Drew Shelton Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Tracking a process back to its PC To: info-tcpware@process.com CC: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Message-ID: <01L2MQWRXF4U002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii We have customers who use Microsoft Access to connect to Oracle's SQL/Services on our VMS systems. All I see on the VMS side is a detached process running under a generic username we created just for this. How can I determine the IP address of the PC that started the process? We're running TCPware 5.5-3 on VMS 7.1-2. Thanks, Drew ============================================================================ Drew Shelton drew@sematech.org VMS Systems Manager office: 512-356-7575 Sematech fax: 512-356-7600 2706 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741-6499 I speak for myself only, not Sematech. "OpenVMS is today what Microsoft wants Windows NT v8.0 to be!" - Compaq, 9/22/98 ============================================================================ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:31:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:30:48 -0500 From: Chuck Viau Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: Tracking a process back to its PC To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7E8A@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In the Oracle administrator account, [ or ORACLE.LISTENER.LOG] find the listener.log file. You will find here every IP that connects through using SQL*NET. I have a PC connecting through right now to my Oracle8 parallel server on node Arial, here is how this PC shows up: (This is a MultiNet example, no difference with TCPWare) The PC connecting is POOLCUE and is coming in via a SQLPLUS outbound session (from PC) to the VMS Server ORACLE. TIMESTAMP * CONNECT DATA [* PROTOCOL INFO] * EVENT [* SID] * RETURN CODE 04-NOV-2003 12:21:15 * (CONNECT_DATA=(CID=(PROGRAM=)(HOST=)(USER=))(COMMAND=stat us)(ARGUMENTS=64)(SERVICE=LISTENER)(VERSION=135294976)) * status * 0 04-NOV-2003 12:21:50 * service_register * ORACLE * 0 04-NOV-2003 12:23:43 * (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=oracle)(CID=(PROGRAM=D:\oracl e\ora81\bin\SQLPLUSW.EXE)(HOST=POOLCUE)(USER=Viau))) * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(H OST=198.115.140.150)(PORT=22249)) * establish * oracle * 0 Hope this helps. You can write a DCL procedure to show connections from this log,or perhaps find one already done on Oracle's site. -CV -----Original Message----- From: Drew Shelton [mailto:DREW@SEMATECH.Org] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:56 AM To: info-tcpware@process.com Cc: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Subject: Tracking a process back to its PC We have customers who use Microsoft Access to connect to Oracle's SQL/Services on our VMS systems. All I see on the VMS side is a detached process running under a generic username we created just for this. How can I determine the IP address of the PC that started the process? We're running TCPware 5.5-3 on VMS 7.1-2. Thanks, Drew ============================================================================ Drew Shelton drew@sematech.org VMS Systems Manager office: 512-356-7575 Sematech fax: 512-356-7600 2706 Montopolis Drive Austin, TX 78741-6499 I speak for myself only, not Sematech. "OpenVMS is today what Microsoft wants Windows NT v8.0 to be!" - Compaq, 9/22/98 ============================================================================ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:29:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:20:10 -0600 (CST) From: Drew Shelton Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: Tracking a process back to its PC To: info-tcpware@process.com CC: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Message-ID: <01L2MVW4EN04002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Chuck Viau wrote: >In the Oracle administrator account, [ or ORACLE.LISTENER.LOG] find >the >listener.log file. You will find here every IP that connects through using >SQL*NET. >I have a PC connecting through right now to my Oracle8 parallel server on >node Arial, >here is how this PC shows up: (This is a MultiNet example, no difference >with TCPWare) >The PC connecting is POOLCUE and is coming in via a SQLPLUS outbound session >(from PC) >to the VMS Server ORACLE. Thanks, but I don't have a LISTENER.LOG file anywhere on my cluster. A search for *listener*.log turned up only FTP_LISTENER.LOG. There are logfiles under the SQL/Services username (SQLSRV$DEFLT), but they do not contain any information about where the connections came from. Thanks again, Drew ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:16:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:15:28 -0500 From: Chuck Viau Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: Tracking a process back to its PC To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7E8C@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 The listener.log is created when you run the TNS LISTENER Daemon, which is responsible for connecting SQL clients into SQL*NET. It is started using $LSRCTL and issuing a START command. You are either not using standard TCP/IP SQL interconnect for you clients or you have disabled the logging for the TNS Listener. -CV -----Original Message----- From: Drew Shelton [mailto:DREW@SEMATECH.Org] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:20 PM To: info-tcpware@process.com Cc: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Subject: RE: Tracking a process back to its PC Chuck Viau wrote: >In the Oracle administrator account, [ or ORACLE.LISTENER.LOG] find >the >listener.log file. You will find here every IP that connects through using >SQL*NET. >I have a PC connecting through right now to my Oracle8 parallel server on >node Arial, >here is how this PC shows up: (This is a MultiNet example, no difference >with TCPWare) >The PC connecting is POOLCUE and is coming in via a SQLPLUS outbound session >(from PC) >to the VMS Server ORACLE. Thanks, but I don't have a LISTENER.LOG file anywhere on my cluster. A search for *listener*.log turned up only FTP_LISTENER.LOG. There are logfiles under the SQL/Services username (SQLSRV$DEFLT), but they do not contain any information about where the connections came from. Thanks again, Drew ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:28:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:27:45 -0500 From: Michael Corbett Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC In-Reply-To: <01L2MQWRXF4U002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FA80BC1.8020604@process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01L2MQWRXF4U002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> Drew Shelton wrote: > We have customers who use Microsoft Access to connect to Oracle's > SQL/Services on our VMS systems. All I see on the VMS side is a detached > process running under a generic username we created just for this. How can > I determine the IP address of the PC that started the process? We're > running TCPware 5.5-3 on VMS 7.1-2. > You can do a NETCU SHOW CONNECTION and look for the connection there. It will give the remote IP address. regards Mike -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Corbett Email: Corbett@process.com Process Software Phone: 800 722-7770 x369 959 Concord St. 508 879-6994 x369 Framingham MA 01701-4682 FAX: 508 879-0042 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:42:50 -0500 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:39:23 -0500 From: Sabu Zacharias Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: IGMP Version. To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L2N0MN92AA8X4LUK@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Does anyone know what version of IGMP spec does TCPWARE 5.4-3 support? I couldn't find anything in the documentation yet.=20 Thanks, Sabu Zacharias 88 Parkway Drive South, Hauppauge, NY Phone 631 233 6727. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:28:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:22:58 -0600 (CST) From: Drew Shelton Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC To: info-tcpware@process.com CC: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Message-ID: <01L2N033IXV2002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii; format=flowed Michael Corbett wrote: >> We have customers who use Microsoft Access to connect to Oracle's >> SQL/Services on our VMS systems. All I see on the VMS side is a detached >> process running under a generic username we created just for this. How can >> I determine the IP address of the PC that started the process? We're >> running TCPware 5.5-3 on VMS 7.1-2. >> > You can do a NETCU SHOW CONNECTION and look for the connection >there. It will give the remote IP address. But the problem is identifying the right connection. Another poster said that a SHOW DEVICE/FULL on each ID could eventually find the PID. Is there a better way? Drew ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 16:39:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:38:57 -0500 From: Michael Corbett Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC In-Reply-To: <01L2N033IXV2002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FA81C71.8090709@process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01L2N033IXV2002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> Drew Shelton wrote: > Michael Corbett wrote: > >>> We have customers who use Microsoft Access to connect to Oracle's >>> SQL/Services on our VMS systems. All I see on the VMS side is a >>> detached >>> process running under a generic username we created just for this. >>> How can >>> I determine the IP address of the PC that started the process? We're >>> running TCPware 5.5-3 on VMS 7.1-2. >>> > >> You can do a NETCU SHOW CONNECTION and look for the connection >> there. It will give the remote IP address. > > > But the problem is identifying the right connection. Another poster said > that a SHOW DEVICE/FULL on each ID could eventually find the PID. Is there > a better way? > Look at the process channels in SDA and you should be able to figure out what BG device the process is using - $ anal/system show sum ! find id of process show proc/chan/id= Once you have the BG device that this process owns you can then find it in NETCU SHOW CONN. regards Mike -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Corbett Email: Corbett@process.com Process Software Phone: 800 722-7770 x369 959 Concord St. 508 879-6994 x369 Framingham MA 01701-4682 FAX: 508 879-0042 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:09:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:00:51 -0600 (CST) From: Drew Shelton Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC In-Reply-To: "Your message dated Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:38:57 -0500" <3FA81C71.8090709@process.com> To: info-tcpware@process.com CC: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Message-ID: <01L2N1FSQIPM002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii; format=flowed References: <01L2N033IXV2002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> > Look at the process channels in SDA and you should be able to >figure out what BG device the process is using - >$ anal/system > show sum ! find id of process > show proc/chan/id= >Once you have the BG device that this process owns you can then find it >in NETCU SHOW CONN. I'm sorry to keep bothering you with this, but here are the channels for one of these processes, and there are no BG devices: Process index: 0099 Name: GENERI004031H Extended PID: 20C66E99 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Process active channels ----------------------- Channel Window Status Device/file accessed ------- ------ ------ -------------------- 0010 00000000 $1$DKC203: 0020 811DF680 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSEXE]SQLSRV_EXEC.EXE;2 0030 8119F0C0 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSEXE]DCL.EXE;1 (section file) 0040 81034680 $1$DKC101:(15266,16,0) (section file) 0050 8174B980 $1$DKC101:[SQLSRV$DEFLT]SQS_PECOS_GENERI004031H.LOG;1 0060 81DE2400 $1$DKC101:(9775,26259,0) 0070 813C3B80 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SECURESHRP.EXE;1 (section file) 0080 811B4E80 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]LIBOTS.EXE;1 (section file) 0090 811B4C00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]LIBRTL.EXE;1 (section file) 00A0 811B6540 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]DECC$SHR.EXE;1 (section file) 00B0 811B5DC0 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]DPML$SHR.EXE;1 (section file) 00C0 811B5640 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]CMA$TIS_SHR.EXE;1 (section file) 00D0 81385F00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SQLSRV_PRVSHR.EXE;2 (section file) 00E0 819B8A80 $1$DKC102:[SYSEXE]RIGHTSLIST.DAT;1 00F0 8129AF40 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]SQLSRV_MESSAGES.EXE;2 0100 811D1880 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]SHRIMGMSG.EXE;1 (section file) 0110 811BEE40 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]DECC$MSG.EXE;1 (section file) 0120 811C5700 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SQLSRV$MOD.EXE;2 0130 8130EE00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDBSHR.EXE;2 (section file) 0140 81313A80 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SQL$INT.EXE;2 (section file) 0150 81314340 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SQL$SHR.EXE;2 (section file) 0160 811A76C0 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]DTI$SHARE.EXE;1 (section file) 0170 811B28C0 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]NCSSHR.EXE;1 (section file) 0180 813C4200 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]LBRSHR.EXE;1 (section file) 0190 81313140 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDB$SHARE.EXE;2 (section file) 01A0 81314E00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDB$COSIP.EXE;2 (section file) 01B0 813C4740 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]SECURESHR.EXE;1 (section file) 01C0 812FAF00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDMSHR.EXE;2 (section file) 01D0 811ABC80 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]EPC$SHR.EXE;1 (section file) 01E0 81305700 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDMSHRP.EXE;2 (section file) 01F0 812FC700 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSLIB]RDMPRV.EXE;4 (section file) 0200 810FA600 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]SQL$MSG.EXE;2 0210 812F1D00 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]RDBMSGS.EXE;2 (section file) 0220 81305780 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]COSI$MSG.EXE;3 (section file) 0230 81195200 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]CXXL$MSG_SHR.EXE;1 0240 8130B800 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]RDMSMSG.EXE;2 (section file) 0250 812F3400 $1$DKC101:[VMS$COMMON.SYSMSG]EPC$MSG.EXE;1 (section file) SDA> These processes are often left "dangling" for many hours. If there is no BG device, does that mean it is orphaned? Should a BG device be in the list if the connection is active? Thanks for your patience, Drew ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 19:28:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 22:45:45 +0300 From: "Ruslan R. Laishev" Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC In-Reply-To: <01L2MVW4EN04002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <1C7FCF73B3668AF7D4E25BA04734D908@nntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Thanks, but I don't have a LISTENER.LOG file anywhere on my cluster. A > search for *listener*.log turned up only FTP_LISTENER.LOG. There are > logfiles under the SQL/Services username (SQLSRV$DEFLT), but they do not > contain any information about where the connections came from. NETCU SHO CONNECTION -- Cheers, Ruslan. +---------------------pure personal opinion------------------------+ RADIUS Server for OpenVMS project - www.starlet.spb.ru/radiusvms/ TKD (WTF) in Russia, St.-Petersburg - www.TaeKwonDo-WTF.SPb.RU ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:20:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 08:19:18 -0500 From: Michael Corbett Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC In-Reply-To: <01L2N1FSQIPM002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> To: info-tcpware@process.com CC: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Message-ID: <3FA8F8D6.3040003@process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01L2N033IXV2002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> <01L2N1FSQIPM002MCT@SEMATECH.Org> Drew Shelton wrote: >> Look at the process channels in SDA and you should be able to >> figure out what BG device the process is using - > > >> $ anal/system >> show sum ! find id of process >> show proc/chan/id= > > >> Once you have the BG device that this process owns you can then find it >> in NETCU SHOW CONN. > > > I'm sorry to keep bothering you with this, but here are the channels for > one of these processes, and there are no BG devices: > > > These processes are often left "dangling" for many hours. If there is no > BG device, does that mean it is orphaned? Should a BG device be in the > list if the connection is active? > If there are no BG, INET, or TCP device then the process does not have open TCP connection. It most likely means that it has closed the connection. regards Mike -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Corbett Email: Corbett@process.com Process Software Phone: 800 722-7770 x369 959 Concord St. 508 879-6994 x369 Framingham MA 01701-4682 FAX: 508 879-0042 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:04:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 17:03:15 -0500 From: Chuck Viau Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: Tracking a process back to its PC To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7E92@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 All the more reason to use the Oracle tools provided for such a purpose. The way that SQL*NET works once you connect in to the Oracle system is transparent to both the client side and the server side when it comes to identifying exactly how many clients are attached, who is active and how many connections they have. You will see multiple connections and have a hard time trying to tell who is doing what if there are multiple clients connected. By looking at the connections on the Oracle side, using the Oracle tools for SQL*NET, you will get a distinct client IP for each user using the database, and the socket connection numbers that they are using. You must set up your TNSListener correctly, with logging and consult the Oracle administrators guide. This would be true for TCPIP Services, as well as MultiNet or TCPWare. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Corbett [mailto:corbett@process.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:19 AM To: info-tcpware@process.com Cc: DREW@SEMATECH.Org Subject: Re: Tracking a process back to its PC Drew Shelton wrote: >> Look at the process channels in SDA and you should be able to >> figure out what BG device the process is using - > > >> $ anal/system >> show sum ! find id of process >> show proc/chan/id= > > >> Once you have the BG device that this process owns you can then find it >> in NETCU SHOW CONN. > > > I'm sorry to keep bothering you with this, but here are the channels for > one of these processes, and there are no BG devices: > > > These processes are often left "dangling" for many hours. If there is no > BG device, does that mean it is orphaned? Should a BG device be in the > list if the connection is active? > If there are no BG, INET, or TCP device then the process does not have open TCP connection. It most likely means that it has closed the connection. regards Mike -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Corbett Email: Corbett@process.com Process Software Phone: 800 722-7770 x369 959 Concord St. 508 879-6994 x369 Framingham MA 01701-4682 FAX: 508 879-0042 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:01:08 -0500 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:59:39 -0500 From: "Pham, Michelle" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To all, I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer on an ALPHA OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. Thank you Michelle=20 Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for the = use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information = that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution = or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication = in error, please notify=20 us immediately and delete the original message. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:19:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 14:18:13 -0600 From: "Wiens, Art (CITG)" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: "'Info-TCPware@process.com'" Message-ID: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC027747C1@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Seeing as how it does PCL emulation, I would try port 9100, which is standard for HP printer network controllers. If you have any kind of network scanning utility, scan it's IP address and look to see which ports are listening. Or just try: $ telnet aa.bb.cc.dd /port=9100 see if it connects. Art > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:00 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > To all, > > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer > on an ALPHA > OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. > > Thank you > > Michelle > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > communication in error, please notify > us immediately and delete the original message. > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:26:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:25:17 -0500 From: Mike Bartman Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE860441A2BD@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful. Does your manual tell you what protocols the printer supports? Telnet, LPD, IPP? -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > To all, > > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer > on an ALPHA > OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. > > Thank you > > Michelle > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > communication in error, please notify > us immediately and delete the original message. > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:31:35 -0500 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:28:49 -0500 From: "Pham, Michelle" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Network Protocol: TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, sbm, Aple Talk Thanks Michelle=20 -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com]=20 Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful. Does your manual tell you what protocols the printer supports? Telnet, LPD, IPP? -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W >=20 >=20 > To all, >=20 > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer > on an ALPHA > OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Michelle >=20 >=20 > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain=20 > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.=20 > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,=20 > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this=20 > communication in error, please notify=20 > us immediately and delete the original message. >=20 Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for the = use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information = that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution = or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication = in error, please notify=20 us immediately and delete the original message. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:33:20 -0500 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:31:21 -0500 From: "Pham, Michelle" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I used Port 9100 for all HP printer. Do have this print at your shop? Thanks. Michelle=20 -----Original Message----- From: Wiens, Art (CITG) [mailto:AWiens@canwest.com]=20 Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:18 PM To: 'Info-TCPware@process.com' Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W Seeing as how it does PCL emulation, I would try port 9100, which is standard for HP printer network controllers. If you have any kind of network scanning utility, scan it's IP address and look to see which ports are listening. Or just try: $ telnet aa.bb.cc.dd /port=3D9100 see if it connects. Art > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:00 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W >=20 >=20 > To all, >=20 > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer > on an ALPHA > OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. >=20 > Thank you >=20 > Michelle >=20 >=20 > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain=20 > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.=20 > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,=20 > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this=20 > communication in error, please notify=20 > us immediately and delete the original message. >=20 Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for the = use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information = that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are = not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution = or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication = in error, please notify=20 us immediately and delete the original message. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:40:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:39:39 -0500 From: Mike Bartman Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE860441A2C1@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I meant printing protocol, not network protocol. We support telnet, LPD and IPP printing protocols with various print symtionts in TCPware. Each one uses a different port and method of specifying the printer address on the net. In the case of telnet, the port number varies from manufacurer to manufacturer, though many emulate HP's use of port 9100. LPD and IPP specify the port number in the RFCs, though IPP allows for use of any port number if the server manufacturer chooses to allow it to be changed from the default of 631. IPP also uses URIs to specify printer address, not a simple IP address. -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:29 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Network Protocol: TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, sbm, Aple Talk > > Thanks > > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM > To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful. Does your > manual tell you what protocols the printer supports? Telnet, > LPD, IPP? > > -- Mike Bartman > Process Software > bartman@process.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM > > To: info-tcpware@process.com > > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > > > > To all, > > > > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer > > on an ALPHA > > OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. > > > > Thank you > > > > Michelle > > > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > > only for the use by the individual or > > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > > information that is privileged, > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > > If you are not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this > > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > > communication in error, please notify > > us immediately and delete the original message. > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > communication in error, please notify > us immediately and delete the original message. > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:07:15 -0500 Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 16:06:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:53:50 -0500 Resent-From: Geoff Bryant From: "Pham, Michelle" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W Resent-To: info-tcpware@process.com To: info-tcpware@process.com Resent-Message-ID: <01L2R8DIQWQ68X4UNH@PROCESS.COM> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_YKBCf4Eqv4CLNQ4n0UJQ/Q)" --Boundary_(ID_YKBCf4Eqv4CLNQ4n0UJQ/Q) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Here is an example of our IP queue set up for (HP 4000) printer: Server queue TS$PRINT, idle, on FHSIDX::"10.94.52.243,9100", mounted form DEFAULT /BASE_PRIORITY=4 /DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /OWNER=[PETGO01,FRAJE02] /PROCESSOR=TCPWARE_TSSYM /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S). I was going to try port 9100 but just wonder if anyone out there use different port for this type of printer. This is the first RICOH printer to be set up on our system. Michelle -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:40 PM To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W I meant printing protocol, not network protocol. We support telnet, LPD and IPP printing protocols with various print symtionts in TCPware. Each one uses a different port and method of specifying the printer address on the net. In the case of telnet, the port number varies from manufacurer to manufacturer, though many emulate HP's use of port 9100. LPD and IPP specify the port number in the RFCs, though IPP allows for use of any port number if the server manufacturer chooses to allow it to be changed from the default of 631. IPP also uses URIs to specify printer address, not a simple IP address. -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:29 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Network Protocol: TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, sbm, Aple Talk > > Thanks > > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM > To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful. Does your > manual tell you what protocols the printer supports? Telnet, LPD, > IPP? > > -- Mike Bartman > Process Software > bartman@process.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM > > To: info-tcpware@process.com > > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > > > > To all, > > > > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer on an > > ALPHA OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. > > > > Thank you > > > > Michelle > > > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for > > the use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This > > message may contain information that is privileged, > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > > If you are not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this > > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > > communication in error, please notify > > us immediately and delete the original message. > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > communication in error, please notify > us immediately and delete the original message. > Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for the use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. --Boundary_(ID_YKBCf4Eqv4CLNQ4n0UJQ/Q) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W

Here is an example of our IP queue set up for (HP 4000) printer:

Server queue TS$PRINT, idle, on FHSIDX::"10.94.52.243,9100",
mounted form DEFAULT
  /BASE_PRIORITY=4 /DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /OWNER=[PETGO01,FRAJE02]
  /PROCESSOR=TCPWARE_TSSYM /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S).

I was going to try port 9100 but just wonder if anyone out there use different port for this type of printer.

This is the first RICOH printer to be set up on our system.

Michelle


-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:40 PM
To: 'info-tcpware@process.com'
Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W


I meant printing protocol, not network protocol.  We support telnet, LPD and IPP printing protocols with various print symtionts in TCPware.  Each one uses a different port and method of specifying the printer address on the net. 

In the case of telnet, the port number varies from manufacurer to manufacturer, though many emulate HP's use of port 9100.  LPD and IPP specify the port number in the RFCs, though IPP allows for use of any port number if the server manufacturer chooses to allow it to be changed from the default of 631.  IPP also uses URIs to specify printer address, not a simple IP address.

-- Mike Bartman
   Process Software
   bartman@process.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:29 PM
> To: info-tcpware@process.com
> Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W
>
>
> Network Protocol: TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, sbm, Aple Talk
>
> Thanks
>
> Michelle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Bartman [mailto:bartman@process.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM
> To: 'info-tcpware@process.com'
> Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W
>
>
> Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful.  Does your
> manual tell you what protocols the printer supports?  Telnet, LPD,
> IPP?
>
> -- Mike Bartman
>    Process Software
>    bartman@process.com
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM
> > To: info-tcpware@process.com
> > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W
> >
> >
> > To all,
> >
> > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer on an
> > ALPHA OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3.
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Michelle
> >
> >
> > Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for
> > the use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This
> > message may contain information that is privileged,
> > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> > If you are not the intended
> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> > distribution or copying of this
> > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this
> > communication in error, please notify
> > us immediately and delete the original message.
> >
>
> Note: The information contained in this message is intended
> only for the use by the individual or
> entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain
> information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law.
> If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this
> information is strictly prohibited. If you received this
> communication in error, please notify
> us immediately and delete the original message.
>

Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.

 

--Boundary_(ID_YKBCf4Eqv4CLNQ4n0UJQ/Q)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:22:39 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:21:38 -0500 From: Mike Bartman Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE860441A2C3@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 That's telnet protocol. 9100 is pretty standard for HP, and as I said, lots of others copy them...but not all. I'm not familiar with Ricoh printers either. If someone else on the list doesn't know, the only way to find the correct port will be to try some until you find it, or check the printer's manual or contact Ricoh and ask. -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com -----Original Message----- From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:54 PM To: info-tcpware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W Here is an example of our IP queue set up for (HP 4000) printer: Server queue TS$PRINT, idle, on FHSIDX::"10.94.52.243,9100", mounted form DEFAULT /BASE_PRIORITY=4 /DEFAULT=(FEED,FORM=DEFAULT) /OWNER=[PETGO01,FRAJE02] /PROCESSOR=TCPWARE_TSSYM /PROTECTION=(S:M,O:D,G:R,W:S). I was going to try port 9100 but just wonder if anyone out there use different port for this type of printer. This is the first RICOH printer to be set up on our system. Michelle -----Original Message----- From: Mike Bartman [ mailto:bartman@process.com] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:40 PM To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W I meant printing protocol, not network protocol. We support telnet, LPD and IPP printing protocols with various print symtionts in TCPware. Each one uses a different port and method of specifying the printer address on the net. In the case of telnet, the port number varies from manufacurer to manufacturer, though many emulate HP's use of port 9100. LPD and IPP specify the port number in the RFCs, though IPP allows for use of any port number if the server manufacturer chooses to allow it to be changed from the default of 631. IPP also uses URIs to specify printer address, not a simple IP address. -- Mike Bartman Process Software bartman@process.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Pham, Michelle [ mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:29 PM > To: info-tcpware@process.com > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Network Protocol: TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, sbm, Aple Talk > > Thanks > > Michelle > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Bartman [ mailto:bartman@process.com] > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:25 PM > To: 'info-tcpware@process.com' > Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > Knowing which protocol you want to use would be helpful. Does your > manual tell you what protocols the printer supports? Telnet, LPD, > IPP? > > -- Mike Bartman > Process Software > bartman@process.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pham, Michelle [ mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] > > Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 3:00 PM > > To: info-tcpware@process.com > > Subject: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W > > > > > > To all, > > > > I am looking for the port # to use to set up this IP printer on an > > ALPHA OpenVMS system running TCPWARE version 5.5-3. > > > > Thank you > > > > Michelle > > > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for > > the use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This > > message may contain information that is privileged, > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > > If you are not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > > distribution or copying of this > > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > > communication in error, please notify > > us immediately and delete the original message. > > > > Note: The information contained in this message is intended > only for the use by the individual or > entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain > information that is privileged, > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. > If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, > distribution or copying of this > information is strictly prohibited. If you received this > communication in error, please notify > us immediately and delete the original message. > Note: The information contained in this message is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 17:33:06 -0500 Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:32:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:09:14 -0600 Resent-From: Geoff Bryant From: "Wiens, Art (CITG)" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W Resent-To: info-tcpware@process.com To: "'Info-TCPware@process.com'" Resent-Message-ID: <01L2RBCZEDEC8X4UNH@PROCESS.COM> Message-ID: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC027747C2@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_eSu8OiuaM4W1bc4fjpncTw)" --Boundary_(ID_eSu8OiuaM4W1bc4fjpncTw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Why not just try it? No harm, no foul if it doesn't work. Art -----Original Message----- From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com] ... I was going to try port 9100 but just wonder if anyone out there use different port for this type of printer. This is the first RICOH printer to be set up on our system. Michelle --Boundary_(ID_eSu8OiuaM4W1bc4fjpncTw) Content-type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 RE: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W
Why not just try it?  No harm, no foul if it doesn't work.
 
Art
-----Original Message-----
 From: Pham, Michelle [mailto:Michelle.Pham@fallon-clinic.com]

... 

 I was going to try port 9100 but just wonder if anyone out there use different port for this type of printer.

This is the first RICOH printer to be set up on our system.

Michelle

 

--Boundary_(ID_eSu8OiuaM4W1bc4fjpncTw)-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 12:41:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 11:27:10 -0600 From: "David J. Dachtera" Subject: Re: RICOH AFICIO 2035 - Multifunction printer B/W To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <3FAE78EE.DEA54C3C@fsi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Wiens, Art (CITG)" wrote: > > Seeing as how it does PCL emulation, I would try port 9100, which is > standard for HP printer network controllers. If you have any kind of > network scanning utility, scan it's IP address and look to see which ports > are listening. Or just try: > > $ telnet aa.bb.cc.dd /port=9100 see if it connects. Multinet has this command: $ MULTINET SHOW/CONNECTIONS/SNMP_ADDRESS=a.b.c.d Dunno if TCPware has a similar facility. -- David J. Dachtera dba DJE Systems http://www.djesys.com/ Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:13:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:12:00 -0500 From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FBA0C90.5050601@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit TCPWare V5.6-2, VMS 7.3-1 The logical tcpware_nameservers (and tcpip_nameservers) is set on my system as a logical search list, looking at the loopback address *first*, before looking at the DNS server. I've tried to change this behavior, by defining both logicals to look at the DNS server only. When I awoke this morning, and checked the logicals, they had "magically" reverted to their "original" configuration. Ideally, I would simply like to reverse the order in whch the addresses are searched, but how do I make this change "permanent"? TIA, ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:08:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:06:38 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Vorl=E4nder=2C_Martin=22?= Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bradford J. Hamilton wrote: > TCPWare V5.6-2, VMS 7.3-1 >=20 > The logical tcpware_nameservers (and tcpip_nameservers) is set on my=20 > system as a logical search list, looking at the loopback address=20 > *first*, before looking at the DNS server. >=20 > I've tried to change this behavior, by defining both logicals=20 > to look at=20 > the DNS server only. When I awoke this morning, and checked the=20 > logicals, they had "magically" reverted to their "original"=20 > configuration. >=20 > Ideally, I would simply like to reverse the order in whch the=20 > addresses=20 > are searched, but how do I make this change "permanent"? The documentation (Chapter 3 in the Management Guide) says: "The configuration procedure (CNFNET) prompts you to specify the internet addresses of up to three name servers the client can query. The client reads this information from two logicals you set through CNFNET:=20 - TCPWARE_DOMAINNAME=20 - TCPWARE_NAMESERVERS" So: Call $ @TCPWARE:CNFNET DNS . This gives you the dialogue: "The client needs to obtain information from an DNS server.=20 Provide the internet address(es) of up to three DNS servers. Use spaces to separate multiple addresses.=20 Note: If the local host is configured as a server, you can enter the loopback internet address or the local host's internet address to make use of that server.=20 Enter the internet address of the server(s) [...]: " cu, Martin --=20 | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer OpenVMS: When you | work: mv@pdv-systeme.de KNOW where you want | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ to go today. | home: martin@radiogaga.harz.de ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:25:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:24:14 -0500 From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FBA8DFE.4000407@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE References: Vorl=E4nder, Martin wrote: > So: Call $ @TCPWARE:CNFNET DNS . This gives you the dialogue: >=20 > "The client needs to obtain information from an DNS server.=20 >=20 > Provide the internet address(es) of up to three DNS servers. Use > spaces to separate multiple addresses.=20 >=20 > Note: If the local host is configured as a server, you can enter > the loopback internet address or the local host's internet address > to make use of that server.=20 >=20 > Enter the internet address of the server(s) [...]: " >=20 > cu, > Martin Thanks - unfortunately, this does not explain the behavior I see. I'= ve=20 *never* configured my local loopback address as a DNS server, but I'v= e=20 just arrived home this afternoon to find that the logicals have been= =20 mysteriously re-assigned, back to the originally-described setup. I = 've=20 done the DNS configuration a number of times, entering only the addre= ss=20 of the server that I wish to use, only to see this behavior crop up= =20 again and again. The behavior "reverts" only after a period of time. The only=20 intervening process on the system is the DHCP client, which renews th= e=20 lease twice/day. I wonder if this is the "trigger" for the behavior= =20 reversion that I see? ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:47:01 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:45:38 -0500 From: Jeff Schreiber Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L36MTOXDOK8X430I@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: > >The behavior "reverts" only after a period of time. The only >intervening process on the system is the DHCP client, which renews the >lease twice/day. I wonder if this is the "trigger" for the behavior >reversion that I see? > It's possible that the DHCP client is tweaking the logical, I'd have to look into that. If you aren't running a nameserver on the local host, it makes no sense that it would point to the local host for name resolution. Check the NAMED_SERVERS definition in TCPWARE:TCPWARE_CONFIGURE.COM and see what it's set at. Does it match what the logical is supposed to be defined as, or does it match what it gets set to? That's what it's configured to be. You might need to open a support call for this one. -Jeff -- Jeff Schreiber Principal Software Engineer Process Software LLC schreiber@mx.process.com http://www.process.com TCPware, MultiNet & PMDF: Stronger than Ever ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:18:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:16:37 -0500 From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: <01L36MTOXDOK8X430I@PROCESS.COM> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FBA9A45.7080907@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <01L36MTOXDOK8X430I@PROCESS.COM> Jeff Schreiber wrote: > "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: > >>The behavior "reverts" only after a period of time. The only >>intervening process on the system is the DHCP client, which renews the >>lease twice/day. I wonder if this is the "trigger" for the behavior >>reversion that I see? >> > > > It's possible that the DHCP client is tweaking the logical, I'd have > to look into that. If you aren't running a nameserver on the local > host, it makes no sense that it would point to the local host for > name resolution. > > Check the NAMED_SERVERS definition in TCPWARE:TCPWARE_CONFIGURE.COM and > see what it's set at. Does it match what the logical is supposed to be > defined as, or does it match what it gets set to? That's what it's > configured to be. > It matches the logical the way I *intend* it to be - one server only (home network setup - DNS server is on the "firewall" box). > You might need to open a support call for this one. > Hobbyist - sorry... :-) > -Jeff > > -- > Jeff Schreiber Principal Software Engineer Process Software LLC > schreiber@mx.process.com http://www.process.com > TCPware, MultiNet & PMDF: Stronger than Ever > > > > ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:54:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:52:52 -0500 From: Jeff Schreiber Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L36P8XAY628X430I@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: > > >It matches the logical the way I *intend* it to be - one server only >(home network setup - DNS server is on the "firewall" box). > So it's getting the local host added before the firewall address somehow? And you don't have anything that might be doing that? It definately sounds like it might have something to do with the DHCP client. I'll try to look into it. -Jeff ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:56:09 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:54:10 -0600 From: "Wiens, Art (CITG)" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical To: "'Info-TCPware@process.com'" Message-ID: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC02774837@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Perhaps I'm not "thinking outside the box", but how large can your home/home network be, that you need to set it up with DHCP, and that you need to renew your DHCP lease twice a day!? > > "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: . > (home network setup - DNS server is on the "firewall" box). . > Hobbyist - sorry... :-) Cheers, Art ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:07:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:06:23 -0700 From: Jim Mehlhop Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC02774837@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.0.20031118160549.01df2ec0@mehlhop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii References: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC02774837@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> That is the default on my linksys wireless router At 03:54 PM 11/18/2003, you wrote: > > >Perhaps I'm not "thinking outside the box", but how large can your home/home >network be, that you need to set it up with DHCP, and that you need to renew >your DHCP lease twice a day!? > > > > "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: >. > > (home network setup - DNS server is on the "firewall" box). >. > > Hobbyist - sorry... :-) > > > >Cheers, >Art ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:19:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:17:51 -0500 From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC02774837@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FBAA89F.9050501@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <7FFD07791928174DAB97CB4C70F61BFC02774837@wpg-exchange.cgs.globaltv.ca> Wiens, Art (CITG) wrote: > > > Perhaps I'm not "thinking outside the box", but how large can your home/home > network be, that you need to set it up with DHCP, and that you need to renew > your DHCP lease twice a day!? > > >>>"Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: > > . > >>(home network setup - DNS server is on the "firewall" box). > > . > >>Hobbyist - sorry... :-) > > > Please, feel free to comment - that's how I learn... > > Cheers, > Art > I was actually thinking of going without DHCP, but since that is the "default" behavior for the firewall, I didn't feel comfortable doing it. I might configure it that way, if I can't solve the problem another way. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:25:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:42:54 +0000 (GMT) From: peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOEGER) Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: In article <3FBA8DFE.4000407@comcast.net>, "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: >The behavior "reverts" only after a period of time. The only >intervening process on the system is the DHCP client, which renews the >lease twice/day. I wonder if this is the "trigger" for the behavior >reversion that I see? It is normally the duty of the DHCP client to set such thinks like DNS server addresses. So decide how to configure: a) DHCP client b) CNFNET fix entries Look also into your DHCP server config. It should not tell DNS clients to use 127.0.0.1 as a DNS server... -- Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER Network and OpenVMS system specialist E-mail peter@langstoeger.at A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:32:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:01:35 -0800 From: cwlow@sportstoto.com.my (lowsir) Subject: TCPware for OpenVMS issues To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <84a51532.0311181901.654a435a@posting.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit We have little knowledge about TCPware for OpenVMs(V7.2-1), lately we encountered TCP connection between two servers hang and require the services to be reset: 1)Are there any situations where the TCPWARE TCP client connection would stop receiving on client end which goes to zero for 5 to 8 seconds before resuming transfer on the connection ? 2)Are there any situations where the TCPWARE(V5.5-3) connection on one link stops and keeps alive but doesn't resume. Disconnect from server end as no effect on link but must be disconnected from client end ? 3)Any issues useing Pseudo devices for client/server connection but the client end uses one of the interface addresses for all exchanges where the server side uses Psuedo IP address ? 4)In the process of data gathering via TCPdump to diagnose the problem, TCPDUMP has fatal error when data is recorded in binary mode and then is replayed. But TCPDUMP in ASCII format is fine. Why ? Thanks in advance ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:42:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:41:20 -0500 From: Chuck Viau Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7EA8@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 I see that this is still an open issue. What has not been asked yet is: Did you modify these logicals outside of the CNFNET utility that sets them? >I've tried to change this behavior, by defining both logicals to look at >the DNS server only. When I awoke this morning, and checked the >logicals, they had "magically" reverted to their "original" configuration. I noticed that Martin Vorlaender gave you an excellent example on how to do that using the CNFNET utility. Modifying this logical outside of CNFNET could result in incompatible attributes being assigned to the names which could cause problems. -----Original Message----- From: peter@langstoeger.at [mailto:peter@langstoeger.at] Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 4:43 PM To: info-tcpware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In article <3FBA8DFE.4000407@comcast.net>, "Bradford J. Hamilton" writes: >The behavior "reverts" only after a period of time. The only >intervening process on the system is the DHCP client, which renews the >lease twice/day. I wonder if this is the "trigger" for the behavior >reversion that I see? It is normally the duty of the DHCP client to set such thinks like DNS server addresses. So decide how to configure: a) DHCP client b) CNFNET fix entries Look also into your DHCP server config. It should not tell DNS clients to use 127.0.0.1 as a DNS server... -- Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER Network and OpenVMS system specialist E-mail peter@langstoeger.at A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:11:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 18:09:47 -0500 From: Geoff Bryant Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: TCPware for OpenVMS issues To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L38420O1DQ8X48NX@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 19:01:35, cwlow@sportstoto.com.my (lowsir) wrote: > >We have little knowledge about TCPware for OpenVMs(V7.2-1), lately we >encountered TCP connection between two servers hang and require the >services to be reset: > >1)Are there any situations where the TCPWARE TCP client connection >would stop receiving on client end which goes to zero for 5 to 8 >seconds before resuming transfer on the connection ? This is difficult to answer. TCPware provides you with the standard TCP protocol. I see below that you are trying to look at things via tcpdump. More information really is needed to answer your question. For example, did you see in a trace that the window went to 0? >2)Are there any situations where the TCPWARE(V5.5-3) connection on one >link stops and keeps alive but doesn't resume. Disconnect from server >end as no effect on link but must be disconnected from client end ? This would almost certainly be an application issue. A trace may give some insight, but you very well may need to know the application to understand the problem. >3)Any issues useing Pseudo devices for client/server connection but >the client end uses one of the interface addresses for all exchanges >where the server side uses Psuedo IP address ? There should be no issues with using the pseudo-device. If you've got the TCP connection, then all is well. >4)In the process of data gathering via TCPdump to diagnose the >problem, TCPDUMP has fatal error when data is recorded in binary mode >and then is replayed. But TCPDUMP in ASCII format is fine. Why ? > >Thanks in advance ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:16:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:14:44 -0500 From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7EA8@lespaul.process.com> To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3FBCA224.4010204@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE8604FD7EA8@lespaul.process.com> Chuck Viau wrote: > I see that this is still an open issue. What has not been asked yet is: > Did you modify these logicals outside of the CNFNET utility that sets them? > > I've done the definitions both ways - DHCP still modifies the entries as described previously. Thanks to all who have responded thus far - I've had stuff to think about. Allow me to ask my question another way: In the "Windows" world, when using DHCP, it is not necessary to define a DNS server; one is provided "automagically". Would the same behavior work in TCPWare? I haven't looked at the DHCP stuff in years, but ISTR that DHCP goes to the trouble of querying the server for information on DNS by default. I ask, because it looks as though I will have a hard time convincing the firewall to give me "static" internal addresses; if I could just give control of DNS to DHCP, I think my problem would be "solved". Comments? Again, thanks for all your help... ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 06:54:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:52:44 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Vorl=E4nder=2C_Martin=22?= Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > In the "Windows" world, when using DHCP, it is not necessary to define = a=20 > DNS server; one is provided "automagically". Would the same behavior=20 > work in TCPWare? Definitely -- if the DHCP server provides this information. > I haven't looked at the DHCP stuff in years, but ISTR=20 > that DHCP goes to the trouble of querying the server for information = on=20 > DNS by default. I ask, because it looks as though I will have a hard=20 > time convincing the firewall to give me "static" internal addresses; = if=20 > I could just give control of DNS to DHCP, I think my problem would be=20 > "solved". You could perhaps have a look at the documentation? http://vms.process.com/ftp/tcpware/documentation/html/management/Ch02.htm= Your DHCLIENT.CONF should probably contain something along the lines of "require domain-name-servers", or at least "request domain-name-servers". cu, Martin --=20 | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer Smiert Spamionem | work: mv@pdv-systeme.de | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ | home: martin@radiogaga.harz.de ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:03:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:02:17 -0500 From: Richard Whalen Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical To: "'info-tcpware@process.com'" Message-ID: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE86051AC373@lespaul.process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If the DHCLIENT.CONF has the following line: prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1 then either delete it, or comment (#) it out. -----Original Message----- From: "Vorl=E4nder, Martin" [mailto:MV@PDV-SYSTEME.DE] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:53 AM To: info-tcpware@process.com Subject: RE: tcpware_nameservers logical > In the "Windows" world, when using DHCP, it is not necessary to = define a=20 > DNS server; one is provided "automagically". Would the same behavior = > work in TCPWare? Definitely -- if the DHCP server provides this information. > I haven't looked at the DHCP stuff in years, but ISTR=20 > that DHCP goes to the trouble of querying the server for information = on=20 > DNS by default. I ask, because it looks as though I will have a hard = > time convincing the firewall to give me "static" internal addresses; = if=20 > I could just give control of DNS to DHCP, I think my problem would be = > "solved". You could perhaps have a look at the documentation? http://vms.process.com/ftp/tcpware/documentation/html/management/Ch02.ht= m Your DHCLIENT.CONF should probably contain something along the lines of "require domain-name-servers", or at least "request domain-name-servers". cu, Martin --=20 | Martin Vorlaender | VMS & WNT programmer Smiert Spamionem | work: mv@pdv-systeme.de | http://www.pdv-systeme.de/users/martinv/ | home: martin@radiogaga.harz.de ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:31:37 -0500 Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:29:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:00:09 -0500 Resent-From: Geoff Bryant From: "Bradford J. Hamilton" Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: tcpware_nameservers logical In-Reply-To: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE86051AC373@lespaul.process.com> Resent-To: info-tcpware@process.com To: info-tcpware@process.com Resent-Message-ID: <01L39L8UF6BM8X4QR7@PROCESS.COM> Message-ID: <3FBD4779.5000009@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii References: <63D30D6E10CFD11190A90000F805FE86051AC373@lespaul.process.com> Richard Whalen wrote: > If the DHCLIENT.CONF has the following line: > prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1 > then either delete it, or comment (#) it out. > Hi Richard, Yes, I came to this conclusion "independently" (after reading Martin's reply) :-) I have made the change, restarted the client, and will await the results. Thanks again to all for their help. Does anyone consider this a "bug", or is everyone happy with the results as they are? ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:06:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:05:18 -0500 From: Always Young Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Increased skin thickness & texture increased energy levels mdv To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L3GJSEYVL68X7GR2@PROCESS.COM> Content-Type: text/plain Today -- Tuesday, November 25 2003 info-tcpware _________________________________________________________________ Human Hormone - also called H.'G.'H is referred to in medical science as the master hormone. It is very plentiful when we are young, but near the age of twenty-one our bodies begin to produce less of it. By the time we are forty nearly everyone is deficient in H.'G.'H, and at eighty our production has normally diminished at least 90-95%. Experience up to an 82% improvement in body fat loss while erasing 10 years in 10 Weeks! Available for limited time only - free fedex shipping http://www.holiday-season-gifts.com To modify from any future correspondence: holiday-season-gifts.com/re Candidate fell and broke arm during interview. "`I think you ought to know that I'm feeling very depressed.'" Candidate brought large dog to interview.,"`Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.' "What are the zodiac signs of all the board members?" "`You'd better be prepared for the jump into hyperspace. It's unpleasently like being drunk.' ehmofrereajwpuvrssrvkyuujbj ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:09:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:07:17 -0500 From: Michael Corbett Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Out of Office reply To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L3GJX91EEQ8X733M@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=us-ascii I will be out of the office until 01-Dec-2003 and will read your message at that time. If you need assistance before then please contact Technical Support at support@process.com or 800-394-8700. You will receive this message only once and will not be reminded of my absence if you send messages in the future. regards Mike ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:20:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:12:55 +0200 From: Godfrey Pillay Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003DAD1242256DEB_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 003DAD1242256DEB_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi We are currently using Net-Work V3.2.3 with Adabas V4.1.1 and Natural V4.1.2(SoftwareAG products) running on DEC VAX with OpenVMS V7.2 and TCPWare V5.3-2. We have been using Net-work configured with the decnet protocol to communicate to Net-work on the mainframe. This has been working successfully over the years. We are now trying to configure Net-work with the TCP/IP protocol as we are trying not to use DECNET. We are being unsuccessful thus far on different versions of TCPWare(5.6 included ,see error below). I have loaded a trial copy of Digital's TCP/IP services and Net-work works fine. It seems that NET-WORK was written with Digitals UCX compatibility. Is there anyone that can help me with this problem or do I need to get Digital'sTCP/IP loaded on my VAX's to get this working. Digital's TCP/IP costs a fortune on the VAX (38 of them) and I am already licenced to run TCPWARE. Thanking you in advance.. The message from the NET-WORK logfile %LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image $1$DIA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE; %SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=00000000, PC=00000002, PSL=03C00000 Context information 00078220 : 322E3756 00078224 : 20202020 00078228 : 00000013 0007822C : 00000003 00078230 : 13000202 00078234 : 00000000 00078238 : 01D40000 ... Regards Godfrey Pillay VAX Team Leader Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G Tel: (011) 302-6310 Fax: (011) 302-6592 Cell: 083 571-7861 E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com "There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't." --=_alternative 003DAD1242256DEB_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi

We are currently using Net-Work V3.2.3 with Adabas V4.1.1 and Natural V4.1.2(SoftwareAG products) running on DEC VAX with OpenVMS V7.2 and TCPWare V5.3-2.

We have been using Net-work configured with the decnet protocol to communicate to Net-work on the mainframe. This has been working successfully over the years. We are now trying to configure Net-work with the TCP/IP protocol as we are trying not to use DECNET. We are being unsuccessful thus far on different versions of TCPWare(5.6 included ,see error below). I have loaded a trial copy of Digital's TCP/IP services and Net-work  works fine.
It seems that NET-WORK was written with Digitals UCX compatibility.

Is there anyone that can help me with this problem or do I need to get Digital'sTCP/IP  loaded on my VAX's to get this working. Digital's TCP/IP costs a fortune on the VAX (38 of them) and I am already licenced to run TCPWARE. Thanking you in advance..
The message from the NET-WORK logfile


%LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image $1$DIA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE;                                                            
                                                                               
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual address=00000000,  PC=00000002, PSL=03C00000                                                      


         Context information                                            
         00078220 :  322E3756                                                  

         00078224 :  20202020                                                  

         00078228 :  00000013                                                  

         0007822C :  00000003                                                  

         00078230 :  13000202                                                  

         00078234 :  00000000                                                  

         00078238 :  01D40000    

         ...


Regards

Godfrey Pillay
VAX Team Leader
Location:  IBM Park Sandton, IA2G
Tel: (011) 302-6310   Fax: (011) 302-6592
Cell: 083 571-7861  
E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com

"There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't."
--=_alternative 003DAD1242256DEB_=-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:46:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 08:44:56 -0500 From: Geoff Bryant Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01L3IQLT611A8X5Y8Q@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE is a part of UCX (Digital TCP/IP services) which provides for soeme configuration of UCX. Something is linked against that and trying to use it. Usually that can be worked around. I am not familiar with Net-Work, but there may be a mode where it doesn't need UCX to work, or perhaps it can be worked around. I would suggest opening a support call. I am assuming this is occuring during a startup .COM procedure. If it is, sending along that .COM file along with any other output besides what you show below would be helpful. Also, are you trying to remove DECnet so you don't have to route it. If so, there are ways to handle that as well. On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:12:55 +0200, Godfrey Pillay wrote: > > >Hi > >We are currently using Net-Work V3.2.3 with Adabas V4.1.1 and Natural >V4.1.2(SoftwareAG products) running on DEC VAX with OpenVMS V7.2 and >TCPWare V5.3-2. > >We have been using Net-work configured with the decnet protocol to >communicate to Net-work on the mainframe. This has been working >successfully over the years. We are now trying to configure Net-work with >the TCP/IP protocol as we are trying not to use DECNET. We are being >unsuccessful thus far on different versions of TCPWare(5.6 included ,see >error below). I have loaded a trial copy of Digital's TCP/IP services and >Net-work works fine. >It seems that NET-WORK was written with Digitals UCX compatibility. > >Is there anyone that can help me with this problem or do I need to get >Digital'sTCP/IP loaded on my VAX's to get this working. Digital's TCP/IP >costs a fortune on the VAX (38 of them) and I am already licenced to run >TCPWARE. Thanking you in advance.. >The message from the NET-WORK logfile > >%LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image >$1$DIA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE; > >%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual >address=00000000, PC=00000002, PSL=03C00000 > > Context information > 00078220 : 322E3756 > 00078224 : 20202020 > 00078228 : 00000013 > 0007822C : 00000003 > 00078230 : 13000202 > 00078234 : 00000000 > 00078238 : 01D40000 > ... > >Regards > >Godfrey Pillay >VAX Team Leader >Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G >Tel: (011) 302-6310 Fax: (011) 302-6592 >Cell: 083 571-7861 >E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com > >"There are 10 types of people in this world: > those who understand binary and those who don't." ------------------------------------------------------------- Geoff Bryant bryant@process.com TCPware/MultiNet/PMDF/SSH/PreciseMailAntiSpam Engineering Process Software http://www.process.com/ 959 Concord St. Framingham, MA 01701 USA ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 19:41:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:16:41 -0600 From: "David J. Dachtera" Subject: Re: cambio de grupo de roswell To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <3FC693E9.B9D7FB87@fsi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cordi wrote: > > vmsnet.networks.misc Los grupos "vmsnet.*" no esta por DIVX. Los grupos "vmsnet.*" esta solo por "vmsnet.*", nada mas. Gracias para su co-operacion. -- David J. Dachtera dba DJE Systems http://www.djesys.com/ Unofficial Affordable OpenVMS Home Page: http://www.djesys.com/vms/soho/ ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 06:00:41 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:55:20 +0200 From: Godfrey Pillay Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Net-work with TCPware problem To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003AEF0D42256DEC_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 003AEF0D42256DEC_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi Geoff Depending on the configuration of Net-work, Net-work could use one of two images. If the configuration is Decnet then it would use an image Decnet.RDI or Vuxnet.rdi if configured to TCP/IP. I have analyzed the image Vuxnet.rdi and found that under the shareable image list, UCX$IPC_SHR and UCX$ACCESS_SHR is included. It would seem that during the linking process these two images were included. I do not have the source code (and SoftwareAG would not supply this) to even try to eliminate this from the link process. SoftwareAG are unwilling to look into this problem as there is no support on the current VAX environment. Their only suggestion is to upgrade to Digital's TCP/IP. I do not have a "NAS" license on my VAX's and would therefore have to pay for the Digtial TCP/IP software and licensing. This is a costly exercise. The reason that I am trying to use TCP/IP and not Decnet is because our connections from the VAX to Mainframe is via a Decnet/SNA gateway(DEC channel Server 11). This equipment is very old and parts are practically non-existant. It is working currently but has a limit of 255 connections. Also the Decnet connections between VAX's passes through a router. The decnet configuration on the router is less stable than TCP/IP. Any further input is welcome. The first prize would be to eliminate UCX links in VUXNET.RDI and I am not sure how to do this if I do not have the source.... Thanking you in advance... Regards Godfrey Pillay VAX Team Leader Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G Tel: (011) 302-6310 Fax: (011) 302-6592 Cell: 083 571-7861 E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com "There are 10 types of people in this world: those who understand binary and those who don't." ----- Forwarded by Godfrey Pillay/South Africa/IBM on 2003/11/28 09:57 AM ----- Geoff Bryant 2003/11/27 03:44 PM Please respond to Info-TCPware To: info-tcpware@process.com cc: Subject: UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE is a part of UCX (Digital TCP/IP services) which provides for soeme configuration of UCX. Something is linked against that and trying to use it. Usually that can be worked around. I am not familiar with Net-Work, but there may be a mode where it doesn't need UCX to work, or perhaps it can be worked around. I would suggest opening a support call. I am assuming this is occuring during a startup .COM procedure. If it is, sending along that .COM file along with any other output besides what you show below would be helpful. Also, are you trying to remove DECnet so you don't have to route it. If so, there are ways to handle that as well. On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:12:55 +0200, Godfrey Pillay wrote: > > >Hi > >We are currently using Net-Work V3.2.3 with Adabas V4.1.1 and Natural >V4.1.2(SoftwareAG products) running on DEC VAX with OpenVMS V7.2 and >TCPWare V5.3-2. > >We have been using Net-work configured with the decnet protocol to >communicate to Net-work on the mainframe. This has been working >successfully over the years. We are now trying to configure Net-work with >the TCP/IP protocol as we are trying not to use DECNET. We are being >unsuccessful thus far on different versions of TCPWare(5.6 included ,see >error below). I have loaded a trial copy of Digital's TCP/IP services and >Net-work works fine. >It seems that NET-WORK was written with Digitals UCX compatibility. > >Is there anyone that can help me with this problem or do I need to get >Digital'sTCP/IP loaded on my VAX's to get this working. Digital's TCP/IP >costs a fortune on the VAX (38 of them) and I am already licenced to run >TCPWARE. Thanking you in advance.. >The message from the NET-WORK logfile > >%LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image >$1$DIA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE; > >%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual >address=00000000, PC=00000002, PSL=03C00000 > > Context information > 00078220 : 322E3756 > 00078224 : 20202020 > 00078228 : 00000013 > 0007822C : 00000003 > 00078230 : 13000202 > 00078234 : 00000000 > 00078238 : 01D40000 > ... > >Regards > >Godfrey Pillay >VAX Team Leader >Location: IBM Park Sandton, IA2G >Tel: (011) 302-6310 Fax: (011) 302-6592 >Cell: 083 571-7861 >E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com > >"There are 10 types of people in this world: > those who understand binary and those who don't." ------------------------------------------------------------- Geoff Bryant bryant@process.com TCPware/MultiNet/PMDF/SSH/PreciseMailAntiSpam Engineering Process Software http://www.process.com/ 959 Concord St. Framingham, MA 01701 USA --=_alternative 003AEF0D42256DEC_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi Geoff

Depending on the configuration of Net-work, Net-work could use one of two images. If the configuration is Decnet then it would use an image Decnet.RDI or Vuxnet.rdi if configured to TCP/IP. I have analyzed the image Vuxnet.rdi and found that under the shareable image list, UCX$IPC_SHR and UCX$ACCESS_SHR is included. It would seem that  during the linking process these two images were included. I do not have the source code (and SoftwareAG would not supply this) to even try to eliminate this from the link process. SoftwareAG are unwilling to look into this problem as there is no support on the current VAX environment. Their only suggestion is to upgrade to Digital's TCP/IP. I do not have a "NAS" license on my VAX's and would therefore have to pay for the Digtial TCP/IP software and licensing. This is a costly exercise.

The reason that I am  trying to use TCP/IP and not Decnet is because our connections from the VAX to Mainframe is via a Decnet/SNA gateway(DEC channel Server 11). This equipment is very old and parts are practically non-existant. It is working currently  but has a limit of 255 connections. Also the Decnet connections between VAX's passes through a router. The decnet configuration on the router is less stable than TCP/IP.


Any further input is welcome. The first prize would be to eliminate UCX links in VUXNET.RDI and I am not sure how to do this if I do not have the source....


Thanking you in advance...

Regards

Godfrey Pillay
VAX Team Leader
Location:  IBM Park Sandton, IA2G
Tel: (011) 302-6310   Fax: (011) 302-6592
Cell: 083 571-7861  
E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com

"There are 10 types of people in this world:
those who understand binary and those who don't."

----- Forwarded by Godfrey Pillay/South Africa/IBM on 2003/11/28 09:57 AM -----
Geoff Bryant <bryant@process.com>

2003/11/27 03:44 PM
Please respond to Info-TCPware

       
        To:        info-tcpware@process.com
        cc:        
        Subject:        



UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE is a part of UCX (Digital TCP/IP services) which provides
for soeme configuration of UCX.   Something is linked against that and trying
to use it.    Usually that can be worked around.

I am not familiar with Net-Work, but there may be a mode where it doesn't need
UCX to work, or perhaps it can be worked around.   I would suggest opening a
support call.   I am assuming this is occuring during a startup .COM procedure.
If it is, sending along that .COM file along with any other output besides what
you show below would be helpful.

Also, are you trying to remove DECnet so you don't have to route it.   If so,
there are ways to handle that as well.

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:12:55 +0200, Godfrey Pillay <gpillay@za.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi
>
>We are currently using Net-Work V3.2.3 with Adabas V4.1.1 and Natural
>V4.1.2(SoftwareAG products) running on DEC VAX with OpenVMS V7.2 and
>TCPWare V5.3-2.
>
>We have been using Net-work configured with the decnet protocol to
>communicate to Net-work on the mainframe. This has been working
>successfully over the years. We are now trying to configure Net-work with
>the TCP/IP protocol as we are trying not to use DECNET. We are being
>unsuccessful thus far on different versions of TCPWare(5.6 included ,see
>error below). I have loaded a trial copy of Digital's TCP/IP services and
>Net-work  works fine.
>It seems that NET-WORK was written with Digitals UCX compatibility.
>
>Is there anyone that can help me with this problem or do I need to get
>Digital'sTCP/IP  loaded on my VAX's to get this working. Digital's TCP/IP
>costs a fortune on the VAX (38 of them) and I am already licenced to run
>TCPWARE. Thanking you in advance..
>The message from the NET-WORK logfile
>
>%LIB-E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image
>$1$DIA0:[SYS0.SYSCOMMON.][SYSLIB]UCX$ACCESS_SHR.EXE;  
>  
>%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
>address=00000000,  PC=00000002, PSL=03C00000                        
>
>          Context information
>          00078220 :  322E3756      
>          00078224 :  20202020      
>          00078228 :  00000013      
>          0007822C :  00000003      
>          00078230 :  13000202      
>          00078234 :  00000000      
>          00078238 :  01D40000    
>          ...
>
>Regards
>
>Godfrey Pillay
>VAX Team Leader
>Location:  IBM Park Sandton, IA2G
>Tel: (011) 302-6310   Fax: (011) 302-6592
>Cell: 083 571-7861
>E-mail: gpillay@za.ibm.com
>
>"There are 10 types of people in this world:
> those who understand binary and those who don't."

-------------------------------------------------------------
Geoff Bryant                                                                    bryant@process.com
TCPware/MultiNet/PMDF/SSH/PreciseMailAntiSpam Engineering                                                  
Process Software                                                 http://www.process.com/
959 Concord St.
Framingham, MA 01701 USA
--=_alternative 003AEF0D42256DEC_=-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:01:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:59:05 +0000 (GMT) From: kleso@centrum.cz Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: MLMPropulsion-10,000 Optin MLM Leads $59 To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <20031130175905.D34802BF220@mailer1.frogleads.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE TEN THOUSAND OPTIN LEADS SELECTED JUST FOR YOU!=20 It's a powerful combination that will propel your downline=20 MLMPropulsion.com offers you 10,000 Optin Leads, 100 Pre-Qualified Leads, Your Own Autoresponder, MLM Training, Promotional and Website = Tools....ALL at an unbelievable low price. It's Your Turn To Succeed = At http://www.MLMPropulsion.com/ Click Now! -------------------------------------------------------This message i= s delivered by Frogleads.com autoresponder service. If the removal li= nk at the bottom isn=92t working, please cut and past it into your br= owser as some times long links can be broken by line brakes. Addition= ally if you would like to block your e-mail address from all mail del= ivered from our service you can ad your e-mail to our global removal = list and will receive no more mail from any of our auto responder. Pl= ease go to the following URL: http://www.frogleads.biz/globalremove.html ----------------------------------------------------------- If you feel that this message was sent to you without your permission= then please file a complaint to abuse@frogleads.com=20 BY FORWARDING A COPY OF THIS MESSAGE. We investigate all cases fully = and will take action against offenders. To remove this email address from further mailings click on the link= below while connected to the internet. http://www.frogleads.biz/cgi-bin/maxuseradmin.cgi?function=3Dmanualde= lete3&email=3Dinfo-tcpware@process.com&un=3DYourMLMSuccess