Archive-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:21:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:23:42 -0120 From: info-tcpware@process.com Subject: MutuaLoan:Instant 90% Mutual Fund Loan To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <01KOT5B07HCI9M0JOQ@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE DRAFT
"We= obtained a=20 credit line using our Mutual Funds."

<= b> Instantly borrow up= to 90 % of=20 your Mutual Funds

<= b> Rates as low as 6.5= %

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

=A0

To Unsubscribe CLICK HERE

=A0

Guaranteed=A0Instant Approval!

Regardles= s of=20 Credit

A MutuaLoan allows=A0you to stay invested= for the long=20 term. You can access cash=A0 instantly=A0 through a credit line t= hat=20 provides liquidity=A0 when you need it. Avoid selling your mutual= =A0=20 fund shares at a loss or paying taxes on capital gains.

What=20 MutuaLoan Can Do For You

  • MutuaLoan can=A0=20 provide you with the down payment to purchase your dream home <= /font>

  • Once open, a=20 MutuaLoan account is your best source of emergency funds

  • Consolidate=20 your high interest debt

Ou= r Loan=20 Professionals Are Standing By To Design Your=A0 Loan Or Provide a= Free Custom=20 Quotation In Just=A0 Minutes.=A0=A0=A0 <= /p>

=A0

APPLY NOW CLICK HERE

=A0 OR CALL 800-800-9209<= /span>

Hours of Operati= on

8:30AM to 7:30PM= =20 EST

=A0

=A0

================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:40:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 17:08:28 +0200 From: Oula =?UNKNOWN?Q?J=E4rvinen?= Subject: PPP through virtual NIC To: info-tcpware@process.com Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Message-ID: <3dd26aaf$1@news.vip.fi> Hi! I am looking for a dialer software that would establish a PPP context to a dialup server, but would look like a NIC in Windows. The idea is to make one PPP context through MS dialup networking and another one through a virtual NIC, so that these two could be controlled independently from windows. That means that the product should use a PPP stack of its own. The other option is an approach where one could see 2 different WAN Miniports in Windows. Normally with 2 dialup connections there is only one WAN Miniport visible. Anybody knows whether there are such products around? Oula ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:10:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:08:30 +0000 From: Guy Morris Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Purveyor RSM To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <019901c290af$11a15ee0$cf091ed4@guy> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am trying to run a new virtual server under Purveyor for which the worker name will be different to that on the main server. I want to do this so that I can make that user have a different set of logicals. I had assumed that I would need to define a new realm to do this, so went to RSM to set one up. (I currently only have the original default realm - and have up until now edited the .DB file directly) However upon trying to change anything through RSM I get the following error message. Error: Unable to write configuration database file I have set the protection of the the .DB file to W:RWED, but still get the same error. Can anyone suggest a solution? (Am I approaching the original problem from the right direction?) ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:23:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:22:30 -0500 From: Michael Corbett Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: Purveyor RSM To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <3DDBB6C6.3030300@process.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <019901c290af$11a15ee0$cf091ed4@guy> Guy Morris wrote: > I am trying to run a new virtual server under Purveyor for which the worker > name will be different to that on the main server. I want to do this so > that I can make that user have a different set of logicals. I had assumed > that I would need to define a new realm to do this, so went to RSM to set > one up. (I currently only have the original default realm - and have up > until now edited the .DB file directly) However upon trying to change > anything through RSM I get the following error message. > > Error: Unable to write configuration database file > > I have set the protection of the the .DB file to W:RWED, but still get the > same error. Can anyone suggest a solution? (Am I approaching the original > problem from the right direction?) > If I remember correctly you can not have different worker names for virtual servers. If you want different username you will have to have multiple DB files. I think this is covered in the 'Advanced Configuration' section of the documentation. As for debugging the RSM problem I would start by turning on audit alarms (set audit/alarm/enable=file=fail=all) and then watch for OPCOM messages. regards Mike -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Corbett Email: Corbett@process.com Process Software Phone: 800 722-7770 x369 959 Concord St. 508 879-6994 x369 Framingham MA 01701-4682 FAX: 508 879-0042 ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:38:10 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:35:20 -0500 From: "Callard, Gavin A." Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: TCPware 5.5-3 and DNS To: "'Info-TCPware@process.com'" Message-ID: <03D308C87334D311B252009027855AC70234D7AF@THUMPER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C296E2.FF4D8180" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C296E2.FF4D8180 Content-Type: text/plain Hi. We're using Windows 2000 DNS as primary, and TCPware on Alpha servers as secondary DNS. W2000 supports incremental and compressed transfers. Does our version of TCPWARE support this too? At the moment the 2000 machine is set to use BIND secondaries (complete transfers). I'd like to switch that option off if possible. Thanks! Gavin. Gavin A. Callard. B.Sc. Hons, NT-MCSE Technical Project Leader (Information Technology Department) Cooper - Avon Tyres, Ltd. Bath Road Melksham SN12 8AA ------_=_NextPart_001_01C296E2.FF4D8180 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi.

 

We're using Windows 2000 DNS as primary, and TCPware on Alpha servers as secondary = DNS. W2000 supports incremental and compressed transfers. Does our version of = TCPWARE support this too? At the moment the 2000 machine is set to use BIND = secondaries (complete transfers). I'd like to switch that option off if = possible.

 

Thanks!

Gavin.

 

Gavin A. = Callard. B.Sc. Hons, = NT-MCSE

Technical Project Leader (Information Technology Department)

 

Cooper - Avon Tyres, = Ltd.

Bat= h Road

Melksham<= /font>

SN12 = 8AA

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C296E2.FF4D8180-- ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:44:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 14:43:04 -0500 From: Jeff Schreiber Reply-To: Info-TCPware@process.com Subject: Re: TCPware 5.5-3 and DNS To: info-tcpware@process.com Message-ID: <01KPEL6R51YS9M1IIT@PROCESS.COM> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii "Callard, Gavin A." writes: > >At the moment the 2000 machine is set >to use BIND secondaries (complete transfers). I'd like to switch that option >off if possible. > Yes, TCPware will work with IXFR. -Jeff -- Jeff Schreiber Principal Software Engineer Process Software LLC schreiber@mx.process.com http://www.process.com TCPware, MultiNet & PMDF: Stronger than Ever