Archive-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 12:11:48 -0500 Subject: How about a IMAP4 server? was Re: POP server from VMS? Message-ID: From: whitney@lars.fordham.edu (David M. Whitney) Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 12:11:48 -0500 References: <54lcse$dfn@netnews.upenn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit In article <01bbc519$b9222ea0$11509a10@cthp13.cth.dec.com>, "infospecialist" wrote: > Hi > > IUPOP3 is one from ftp://ftp.indiana.edu/pub/vms/iupop3/ > > > > Anthony Olejnik wrote in article > <54lcse$dfn@netnews.upenn.edu>... > > > > Hi, > > > > Can anyone please recommende/point-me-to a POP (Post Office Protocol) > > server for VMS? > > > > I'm running Wollongong's TCPIP under VMS and am currently using DEC's > > All-in-One. I'd like to migrate to POP (using PCeudora on my client > > PCs). > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Many thanks in advance. > > > > --tony > > Does anyone know about a free IMAP4 server that will work with Multinet (or UCX)? I like Multinet and don't want to pay for the PMDF product. TIA. -- David M. Whitney System's Programmer, and Postmaster, Fordham University whitney@brenda.fordham.edu ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 00:35:16 +0000 Subject: Re: How about a IMAP4 server? was Re: POP server from VMS? Message-ID: <327A9744.215C@videotron.ca> From: Jean-Francois Mezei Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 00:35:16 +0000 Reply-To: jfmezei@videotron.ca References: <54lcse$dfn@netnews.upenn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Anthony Olejnik wrote in article > > > > > > I'm running Wollongong's TCPIP under VMS and am currently using DEC's > > > All-in-One. I'd like to migrate to POP (using PCeudora on my client > > > PCs). ALL-IN-1 v 3.2 supports POP. EG: you can use Eudora to connect to your allin1 file cabinet and pickup your mail. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 7 Nov 1996 14:28:57 -0500 Subject: does send() EWOULDBLOCK "properly"? Message-ID: From: dpm@access2.digex.net (David P. Murphy) Date: 7 Nov 1996 14:28:57 -0500 /* note: this is crossposted to each vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.* group * with followups directed to .misc */ i am programming an application which transfers data. unfortunately i've encountered a {bug}{feature}{implementation-specific issue}, and i would greatly appreciate any input for each VMS available stack. i would like to know how each product has implemented the send() function for a non-blocking socket: if a send() to such a socket can transfer only part of the request, that many bytes are sent and the number sent is returned from send(). if _no_ bytes can be sent, then -1 is returned and errno is set to 35 (EWOULDBLOCK). testing shows that a partial write [on a certain version of an unnamed product] send() *sometimes* returns the number of bytes that did make it to the receiver and *sometimes* returns -1, even though a small number of bytes were in fact received. this of course destroys the usefulness of non-blocking sends. any opinions, advice, knowledge or pointers are welcome. thanks. ok dpm -- David P. Murphy mailto:murphy@connor.datametrics.com (work) systems programmer mailto:dpm@access.digex.net (personal) http://www.access.digex.net/~dpm COGITO ERGO DISCLAIMUM ftp://ftp.access.digex.net/pub/access/dpm ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 22:51:27 GMT Subject: Re: Just try this, it will work Message-ID: <3281160d.1352823@nntp.netcruiser> From: dspecht@ix.netcom.com (Don Specht) Date: Wed, 06 Nov 1996 22:51:27 GMT References: <810.051093963906@news.nemonet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit sbolting@nemonet.com (Stephen Boltinghouse) wrote: Go fry your spam in some other pan, lbh shpxvat cvrpr bs jbeguyrff fuvg. ds ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 9 Nov 1996 00:45:30 -0500 Subject: Re: does sned() EWOULDBLOCK "properly"? Message-ID: <1996Nov9.004530@process.com> From: volz@process.com (Bernie Volz) Date: 9 Nov 96 00:45:30 -0500 >i am programming an application which transfers data. unfortunately i've >encountered a {bug}{feature}{implementation-specific issue}, and i would >greatly appreciate any input for each VMS available stack. > >i would like to know how each product has implemented the send() function >for a non-blocking socket: if a send() to such a socket can transfer >only part of the request, that many bytes are sent and the number sent >is returned from send(). if _no_ bytes can be sent, then -1 is returned >and errno is set to 35 (EWOULDBLOCK). testing shows that a partial write >[on a certain version of an unnamed product] send() *sometimes* returns the >number of bytes that did make it to the receiver and *sometimes* returns -1, >even though a small number of bytes were in fact received. this of course >destroys the usefulness of non-blocking sends. Your assumption about how the non-blocking send should be handled are correct. If any data is put in the outgoing buffers at the TCP layer, that number of bytes will be returned by the send. If no data makes it into the outgoing buffers (ie, they are full for that connection), then -1 would be returned (errno = EWOULDBLOCK). This is the way TCPware handles non-blocking sends. - Bernie Volz Process Software Corporation (TCPware and Purveyor) ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 13 Nov 1996 15:30:49 GMT Subject: TCP/IP Network Load Monitoring Message-ID: <01bbd178$513f3c40$ea5278cb@mohdfarhad> From: "Mohd Farhad Omar" Date: 13 Nov 1996 15:30:49 GMT Looking for kernel hackers for TCP/IP Netwrok Load Monitoring modules for a proprietary network ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 16 Nov 1996 21:24:29 GMT Subject: Re: Finger follow-up Message-ID: <56lbed$4af@news.wku.edu> From: goathunter@process.com (Hunter Goatley) Date: 16 Nov 1996 21:24:29 GMT Reply-To: goathunter@process.com (Hunter Goatley) References: <56g2b1$af9@Nntp1.mcs.net> In article <56g2b1$af9@Nntp1.mcs.net>, James W. Barr writes: > >OK, I saw in [tcpware.examples] the source for FINGER (finger.c) as well >as several other sources. I don't have "C" on my system, so how can I get >complied executables? > I will try to get those up on ftp.process.com For a more full-fledged FINGER client and server, you might want to look at MadGoat FINGER. It uses MadGoat's NETLIB, which allows it to work with all TCP/IP implementations, including TCPware. You can find it on ftp.wku.edu in [.MADGOAT]MG_FINGER.ZIP. >Additionally, whois doesn't seem to work either. > WHOIS is trying to contact ds.internic.net. The current server is now rs.internic.net. For now, just define the logical TCPWARE_WHOIS_SERVER: $ define/system/exec tcpware_whois_server "rs.internic.net" and WHOIS should work OK. This will be fixed in TCPware V5.2. Hunter ------ Hunter Goatley, Process Software (TCPware for OpenVMS) http://www.wku.edu/www/madgoat/hunter.html ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:22:45 GMT Subject: Mailing lists with TCPware (version 5.1) Message-ID: <328b1b86.14704795@news.axion.bt.co.uk> From: thomasgd@boat.bt.com (Greg Thomas) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:22:45 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, We are running TCPware version 5.1 on OpenVMS VAX 5.5-2 - and I can't seem to get mailing lists to work. VRFY and EXPN both appear to be enabled, the TCPWARE_SMTP_MAILING_LIST_DIRECTORY logical is defined, but I still can't seem to get it (EXPN or mailing lists) to work - does anyone have any ideas? TIA, Greg (Example follows ...) $ type tcpware_smtp_mailing_list_directory:a.a thomasgd@omc.bt.co.uk thomasgd@omc.bt.co.uk $ telnet localhost smtp %TCPWARE_TELNET-I-TRYING, trying localhost,smtp (127.0.0.1,25) ... %TCPWARE_TELNET-I-ESCCHR, escape (attention) character is "^\" 220 omc.bt.co.uk SMTP-OpenVMS V5.1-4 (c) 1996 Process Software Corporation VRFY thomasgd 250 Greg Thomas bt ok EXPN a.a 550 String does not match anything TELNET> exit ================================================================================ Archive-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 09:17:50 GMT Subject: Re: Mailing lists with TCPware (version 5.1) Message-ID: <329029a1.1174241@news.axion.bt.co.uk> From: thomasgd@boat.bt.com (Greg Thomas) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 09:17:50 GMT References: <328b1b86.14704795@news.axion.bt.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 14 Nov 1996 13:22:45 GMT, thomasgd@boat.bt.com (Greg Thomas) wrote: >Hi, >We are running TCPware version 5.1 on OpenVMS VAX 5.5-2 - and I can't >seem to get mailing lists to work. VRFY and EXPN both appear to be >enabled, the TCPWARE_SMTP_MAILING_LIST_DIRECTORY logical is defined, >but I still can't seem to get it (EXPN or mailing lists) to work - >does anyone have any ideas? > >TIA, It appears a patch is required from TCPware to allow mailling lists to work with 5.1-4 - thanks for all your help, Greg #include ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 21 Nov 1996 15:16:55 EST Subject: How to disable RMS versions in rcp Message-ID: <1996Nov21.151655.16498@giant> From: del@giant.intranet.com (G. Del Merritt) Date: 21 Nov 96 15:16:55 EST I am using TCPware for OpenVMS/VAX version V5.1-4, running under OpenVMS/VAX 6.1. I recently enabled rcp. When I rcp from a remote (AIX 4.2) host: aixbox% rcp tcpwarehost:file.foo file.foo I get "file.foo" in my current working directory. However, when I aixbox% rcp tcpwarehost:file.foo . I get "file.foo;n", where ";n" is the version number. I don't see in the management docs that I have how top disable VMS versioning. Is there a logical or other option for ensuring that versions are not included? The particular issue is for commands of the form: aixbox% rcp "tcpwarehost:[workir]*.*" . Thanks. -- Del Merritt, ** del@IntraNet.com IntraNet, Inc., One Gateway Center #700, Newton, MA 02158 Voice: 617-527-7020; FAX: 617-527-1761 Just say no to Clipper. You may not add me to a commercial mailing list or send me commercial advertising without my consent. ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 22 Nov 1996 14:21:55 -0500 Subject: Re: How to disable RMS versions in rcp Message-ID: <1996Nov22.142155@process.com> From: hurchalla@process.com (Jeffrey Hurchalla) Date: 22 Nov 96 14:21:55 -0500 References: <1996Nov21.151655.16498@giant> In article <1996Nov21.151655.16498@giant>, del@giant.intranet.com (G. Del Merritt) writes: > I am using TCPware for OpenVMS/VAX version V5.1-4, running under OpenVMS/VAX > 6.1. I recently enabled rcp. When I rcp from a remote (AIX 4.2) host: > aixbox% rcp tcpwarehost:file.foo file.foo > > I get "file.foo" in my current working directory. However, when I > aixbox% rcp tcpwarehost:file.foo . > > I get "file.foo;n", where ";n" is the version number. I don't see in the > management docs that I have how top disable VMS versioning. Is there a > logical or other option for ensuring that versions are not included? The > particular issue is for commands of the form: > aixbox% rcp "tcpwarehost:[workir]*.*" . > > Thanks. > Del- There's a patch available which will fix the bug of VMS version numbers being included along with the filename. You can access it via anonymous ftp to ftp.process.com. Change directory to 51_5 under the support directory and set type image. The patch name is RCP_V515P010.A If you have any questions, you can call 800-722-7770 or email support@process.com Hope this helps you. Jeff Hurchalla, Process Software (TCPware for OpenVMS) ================================================================================ Archive-Date: XXX, 14 Nov 1996 21:18:25 GMT Subject: Finger follow-up Message-ID: <56g2b1$af9@Nntp1.mcs.net> From: James W. Barr Date: 14 Nov 1996 21:18:25 GMT OK, I saw in [tcpware.examples] the source for FINGER (finger.c) as well as several other sources. I don't have "C" on my system, so how can I get complied executables? Additionally, whois doesn't seem to work either. -- -Jim ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- James W. Barr, N9ONL | e-mail: jbarr@mcs.com Buffalo Grove, IL, USA | Web site: http://www.mcs.net/~jbarr ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- US Robotics' Pilot Organizer info: http://www.usr.com GEOS Operating system info : http://www.geoworks.com GEOS IZL info: send e-mail to jferas@netaxs.com -----------------------------------------------------------------------------